中文

S16 Worlds · Player Champion Preferences

M3 · Player preferences and opposing bans anchored to the M1 meta

Project home · M1 champion meta · Method and reproduction

Predictions are conditional on playing; substitutes are not assumed to appear. Classic career data provides era-normalized preferences; direct training labels use Full Fearless only. Signature status or a high career win rate does not guarantee priority in a weak current meta.

S15 evaluation and actual pick-count comparison

Inspect actual pick counts by player

ChampionM1M3 pre-eventActual countForecast − actual
Model and data coverage

A role-specific masked multinomial model predicts picks; an M1-anchored Bernoulli regression predicts opponent bans. Nine factor coefficients are shared across champions and players; there are no manual Faker/Azir scores. Chronological S15 validation selects a 45-day recent-preference half-life. The comfort-mixture coefficient is 7.66%, not an equal percentage-point bonus to each champion. Win, MVP and KDA use small-sample shrinkage. KDA is adjusted for role, league, patch, champion and the player’s year-wide performance, avoiding unqualified strong-team or zero-death bonuses. Repeated exact-role comfort retains an independent preference pathway with a mixture learned on S15.

MVP coverage is partial and currently limited to successfully matched LPL game awards; missing is neutral. Series MVPs are not assigned to one champion. Reputation uses dated sourced associations, has incomplete coverage, and may receive a learned zero weight. Available career archives begin in 2014; individual coverage varies and pre-2014 records are incomplete.

Forecasts average legal Full Fearless contexts from the past 90 days; this is not a specific-opponent, side-aware or BO5 game-one draft simulator. Champion-level bans combine the team’s five players and do not establish coaches’ targeting intent. Independent ban marginals do not yet force exactly five bans in a legal sequence. Recent professional practice and KR patch shifts enter through M1 without a duplicated correction.

Raw evaluation · Data coverage · MVP validation